Bayesian Two-Stage Design for Phase II Clinical Trials with Switching Hypothesis Tests
نویسندگان
چکیده
Conventional phase II clinical trials use either a single-arm or a doublearm scheme to examine the treatment effect of an investigational drug. The hypotheses tests under these two schemes are different, as a single-arm study usually tests the response rate of the new drug against a set of fixed reference rates and a double-arm randomized trial compares the new drug with the standard treatment or placebo. To bridge the singleand double-arm schemes in one phase II clinical trial, we propose a Bayesian two-stage design with changing hypothesis tests. Stage 1 enrolls patients solely to the experimental arm to make a comparison with the reference rates, and stage 2 imposes a double-arm comparison of the experimental arm with the control arm. The design is calibrated with respect to error rates from both the frequentist and Bayesian perspectives. Moreover, we control the “type III error rate”, defined as the probability of prematurely stopping the trial at stage 1 when the trial is supposed to move on to stage 2. We conduct extensive simulations on the calculations of these error rates to examine the operational characteristics of our proposed method, and illustrate it with a non-small cell lung cancer trial. MSC 2010 subject classifications: Primary 62C10; secondary 62P10.
منابع مشابه
Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship
BACKGROUND For many molecularly targeted agents, the probability of response may be assumed to either increase or increase and then plateau in the tested dose range. Therefore, identifying the maximum effective dose, defined as the lowest dose that achieves a pre-specified target response and beyond which improvement in the response is unlikely, becomes increasingly important. Recently, a class...
متن کاملFull title: A likelihood-based approach to early stopping in single arm phase II cancer clinical trials Short title: Likelihood-based early stopping design in single arm phase II studies
In single arm phase II trials (in cancer research in particular), Simon’s twostage design has become most commonly used due to its simplicity, its ability to allow early stopping for futility, and preservation of type I and type II errors. As an alternative, likelihood-based approaches which allow frequent looks at the data and are similar to the Bayesian adaptive designs, whereby there is not ...
متن کاملRandomized Phase II Trials: a Bayesian Two-Stage Design
Single-arm two-stage designs are commonly used in phase II of clinical trials. However, the use of randomization in phase II trials is currently increasing. We propose a randomized version of a Bayesian two-stage design due to Tan and Machin [2]. The idea is to select the two-stage sample sizes by ensuring a large posterior probability that the true response rate of the experimental treatment e...
متن کاملA predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials.
BACKGROUND Two- or three-stage designs are commonly used in phase II cancer clinical trials. These designs possess good frequentist properties and allow early termination of the trial when the interim data indicate that the experimental regimen is inefficacious. The rigid study design, however, can be difficult to follow exactly because the response has to be evaluated at prespecified fixed num...
متن کاملA Bayesian pick-the-winner design in a randomized phase II clinical trial
Purpose Many phase II clinical trials evaluate unique experimental drugs/combinations through multi-arm design to expedite the screening process (early termination of ineffective drugs) and to identify the most effective drug (pick the winner) to warrant a phase III trial. Various statistical approaches have been developed for the pick-the-winner design but have been criticized for lack of obje...
متن کامل